Guide to Handicapping Synthetic Races
HANDICAPPING SYNTHETIC RACES
The basics of handicapping synthetic races whether it be at Turfway Park or Gulfstream Park is largely the same as how you handicap races on the turf or dirt, but there are certain factors to be aware of that might be different if you are unaccustomed to playing those tracks.
Weather
When handicapping turf and dirt races we often think of rain being the defining factor. Certainly, synthetic tracks can play like dirt tracks when they take on a lot of moisture, but temperature matters too. Particularly at Gulfstream Park, the track plays differently the warmer or colder it is outside. As the temperature heats up, the track expands and horses will run over a deeper surface, which often makes it difficult for frontrunners to wire the field. On warmer days, you want to find horses tracking from off the pace. When the temperature goes down, the tapeta becomes more contracted and as a result frontrunners can glide over the surface while expending less energy. Think of it as running at the beach down by the water where the sand is compact as opposed to running toward the back of the beach where the sand is light and fluffy.
Workouts
Anyone who handicaps turf racing knows that it is helpful to watch horses work over grass, particularly maidens, to see if they “perk up” compared to their dirt workouts. The same logic is true for synthetics. When playing Gulfstream Park and Turfway Park, it is so important to look at the workout tabs to see which horses have been working over the surface and how they have been working. At Turfway Park, many times horses will continue to work out at Churchill or Keeneland, but I always like to see a horse get a local work in if they have not run on synthetic before just to make sure they get a feel for the track. The same is true at Gulfstream Park where you can find big value when looking at which horses work over the synthetic, particularly on days when the races get moved off the grass.
Pedigree Matters
As mentioned in the FAQ's below, horses like Hard Spun and Ghostzapper have had numerous offspring with synthetic success. However, sires such as Munnings and Candy Ride both also have strong winning percentages (18%) with their synthetic starters. Meanwhile, traditionally successful stallions such as Into Mischief, Tapit, Uncle Mo, and Medaglia d’Oro have roughly the same win percentage for their offspring on synthetic that you see on turf or dirt. However, superstar sire Gun Runner, is a little below average producing synthetic winners, which is likely tied to his struggles producing notable turf progeny. One of the hot freshman sires in 2023 is Omaha Beach. He is relatively untested as a synthetic sire, and it will be important to track how his progeny do this winter at Gulfstream Park as we see more of them run over the tapeta surface.
Running Lines
It might seem simple, but sometimes you just must trust the horse. For more experienced horses, oftentimes they will have had multiple races over a synthetic surface so you can simply look to see how those efforts compare to their other non-synthetic efforts and what it would take to win that day’s race. It is not uncommon when looking at horses alternating between turf/synthetic or dirt/synthetic that they have a preference and run higher speed figures over one than the other. Finding horses with muddied running lines that alternate between different surfaces can be the ones that provide the most value, particularly at Gulfstream Park in races that were intended for the grass and get moved to the tapeta.
Trainer Angles
Looking at trainer angles is important when playing synthetic tracks, but context is also required since trainers like Saffie Joseph Jr., Mark Casse, and Jose D’Angelo have large barns and turn out hundreds of synthetic starters per year. However, we do see some interesting trends pertaining to trainer success over synthetic surfaces. Below is a chart comparing the overall win percentage and ROI to the win percentage and ROI on synthetic for trainers over the last five years.
| Trainer | Overall win % | Overall ROI | Synthetic win % | Synthetic ROI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Todd Pletcher | 20% | $1.54 | 22% | $1.85 |
| Chad Brown | 24% | $1.70 | 24% | $1.67 |
| Saffie Joseph Jr. | 22% | $1.72 | 22% | $1.49 |
| Brad Cox | 26% | $1.67 | 27% | $1.82 |
| Mark Casse | 16% | $1.56 | 19% | $1.69 |
| Paulo Lobo | 19% | $2.03 | 16% | $2.16 |
| Wesley Ward | 26% | $1.71 | 27% | $1.58 |
| Steve Asmussen | 17% | $1.43 | 12% | $1.51 |
| Brendan Walsh | 16% | $1.65 | 15% | $1.35 |
| Mike Maker | 16% | $1.56 | 16% | $1.45 |
| Jose D'Angelo | 19% | $1.60 | 22% | $1.75 |
| Graham Motion | 17% | $1.52 | 18% | $1.72 |
While Chad Brown’s numbers are impressive, he has turned out the smallest number of synthetic starters (36) over the last five years. The trainers who should catch your eye are Paulo Lobo and Wesley Ward who run a lot of horses over the synthetic and return a positive flat bet ROI. Obviously, trainers like Brad Cox, Saffie Joseph Jr., and Todd Pletcher also have a good amount of success on synthetic, but their win percentages and ROIs are roughly aligned with their overall numbers. On the flip side, the winningest trainer in North American history, Steve Asmussen, is one of the worst bets when running on a synthetic surface.
Bottom Line
Embrace synthetics. I find them to be a fun alternative to dirt and turf racing as they can provide good value. Much like any other surface, the more time you spend handicapping synthetic races the more comfortable you will get playing them. Do not fret when Gulfstream Park goes off turf and the races are moved to the tapeta. Rather, take a few minutes at look at the PPs to see what sticks out and whether you can find a longshot who might like the new surface. Do not get overwhelmed by the field sizes at Turfway Park, instead focus on local workouts and reliable trainers like Paulo Lobo.
What type of horses run best on synthetic surfaces?
Currently, turf horses tend to prefer the synthetic surface over dirt horses, but obviously there are exceptions to every rule. The fact turf horses take so well to the synthetic is why a track like Gulfstream Park can move a race off the turf and not get many scratches since most of the entries will still enjoy the footing on the tapeta course. At Woodbine when the turf course becomes unusable over the winter due to temperatures, all the horses run on synthetic. At Turfway Park it is common to see turf horses from Keeneland and Churchill Downs stay there over the winter to run on the synthetic track.
Who are the best synthetic sires?
In recent years, we have seen a few consistent names among the top synthetic sires. Hard Spun and Ghostzapper are two sires who have had a good amount of synthetic success in recent years. Hard Spun’s star progeny in 2023 was Two Phil’s who won the Jeff Ruby Steaks at Turfway Park before finishing second in the Kentucky Derby. What makes Hard Spun such a noteworthy synthetic sire is that one of his offspring, Reload, has also become a strong synthetic sire. Meanwhile, Ghostzapper produced Moira and Wolfie’s Dynaghost who are both very good horses on the synthetic surface.
What tracks have synthetic surfaces?
In North America, Gulfstream Park, Golden Gate Fields, Presque Isle, Turfway Park, and Woodbine all have synthetic surfaces. In the case of Turfway Park and Presque Isle, they ONLY have a synthetic racing surface. Meanwhile, Golden Gate Fields and Woodbine also have a turf course. Finally, Gulfstream Park has a dirt and turf course in addition to their synthetic surface. Historically, Santa Anita, Keeneland, and Arlington Park all had synthetic surfaces.
Why are synthetic tracks called so many different things?
It’s true that you could hear a synthetic track referred to as “Polytrack,” “Tapeta,” and “all-weather” in addition to the generic synthetic label. Some of these are simply semantic preferences, but there are minor differences in the composition of the Tapeta surface at Gulfstream Park compared to the all-weather surface of Woodbine.
Why are synthetic surfaces popular?
There are two primary reasons that tracks install synthetic surfaces: weather and safety. Synthetic surfaces provide a feasible alternative to both dirt and turf racing. In the case of Gulfstream Park, Golden Gate Fields, and Woodbine, races can be moved onto the synthetic surface if their turf courses are unusable due to poor weather conditions. Additionally, tracks like Turfway Park and Presque Isle often face bouts of inclement weather which makes the synthetic surface a logical one to use to ensure racing can continue. Safety is also a major consideration as injuries seem to occur less often on the surface. In 2022, there were three times fewer injuries per 1,000 starts on synthetic surfaces than on dirt while injuries were half as likely to occur on a synthetic track than a turf course.


